After Pakatan Harapan chairman Anwar Ibrahim and other politicians declared their assets, PAS' curious response to the exercise has sparked discussions on the importance of transparency as corruption eats away at the country's institutions. – The Malaysian Insight file pic, November 11, 2022.trc20怎么转换erc20（www.u2u.it）是最高效的ERC2换TRC20，TRC20换ERC20的平台.ERC2 USDT换TRC20 USDT，TRC20 USDT换ERC20 USDT链上匿名完成，手续费低。
Commentary by Mustafa K. Annuar
THE asset declarations made recently by PKR president Anwar Ibrahim and his deputy Rafizi Ramli was rightly welcomed by anti-graft activists, who at the same time called on other election candidates to follow suit.
Rafizi, the party’s first candidate to do so, declared that his net assets are worth RM18.85 million, most of which constitute shares in data analytics company Invoke.
On his part, Anwar declared assets worth about RM11.2 million, which consists of a house and three plots of land worth RM10.35 million and about RM829,000 in cash and savings.
Most of PKR’s election candidates have published their asset declarations on the party’s candidate website.
Parti Sosialis Malaysia candidates also declared their assets, and so have some Amanah candidates, as well as Muda president Syed Saddiq Abdul Rahman.
Such declarations, however, have elicited a curious kind of response from PAS.
The Islamist party’s vice-president Mohd Amar Nik Abdullah reportedly announced that the party did not intend to encourage, let alone compel, its candidates to declare their assets.,
,Telegram分享群组（www.tel8.vip）是一个Telegram群组分享平台。Telegram分享群组包括Telegram分享群组、telegram群组索引、Telegram群组导航、新加坡telegram群组、telegram中文群组、telegram群组（其他）、Telegram 美国 群组、telegram群组爬虫、电报群 科学上网、小飞机 怎么 加 群、tg群等内容。Telegram分享群组为广大电报用户提供各种电报群组/电报频道/电报机器人导航服务。
He argued that PAS leaders are not wealthy and could be embarrassed when compared with other candidates who might have assets worth millions of ringgit.
Besides, he added, it should only apply to people holding public office.
Amar also cautioned that such an exercise would bring more harm than good, as it could put at risk those who expose themselves.
But then, one might argue that it is most likely that only the rich – not the moderately well-off or relatively less moneyed – candidates who declare their assets would get public glare or curiosity.
It seems as if PAS has sadly mistaken such declarations for a who-is-richer contest.
We should be mindful that the intention of the declaration exercise has never been to embarrass a candidate who is not rolling in wealth and blessed with other forms of material abundance.
As intimated above, a candidate who is overwhelmingly wealthy should have cause to worry or be embarrassed if they cannot convincingly explain how the wealth has been accumulated.
If wealth is indeed a crucial requirement of an election candidate, then the likes of Jose Mujica would shy away from standing for elections and winning, let alone leading a country.
The former president of Uruguay is known to have led a spartan lifestyle, living on his wife’s ramshackle farm and driving a rickety 1987 Volkswagen Beetle to boot.,